Home > Animal behavior, Human-wildlife conflict, Wildlife management, wildlife conservation > Say What? Massachusetts Community Holds Memorial Service for Deceased Turkey

Say What? Massachusetts Community Holds Memorial Service for Deceased Turkey

August 11th, 2009

Ben Franklin favored the turkey, rather than the bald eagle, as our nation’s symbol.  Some residents of the small town of Easton, MA have gone one step further by holding a memorial  service for a wild turkey named “Freddy” after he was shot and killed last week by local police.  Many mourners left flowers and notes for the deceased bird. One grief-stricken individual even set up a Facebook site for “Freddy,” which currently has over 1,500 fans.

The turkey in question had become a local favorite, roaming around town, visiting local businesses and probably taking handouts from people.  But, in a classic case of wildlife habituation, Freddy” took a turn for the worse when he became aggressive, attacking an unsuspecting  motorcyclist at a red light.  Police felt that the bird’s aggressive behavior toward humans made relocation infeasible, and thus Freddy was given a death sentence. 

I find this story of human-animal relationships particularly fascinating and somewhat tragic. I hate to say this for fear of drawing Easton’s wrath, but the local residents–the same folks mourning “Freddy’s” death– probably caused the animal’s demise through their misguided compassion.  Turkeys can be aggressive and the more habituated and closer they become to humans, the less fear they have of attacking them.  Thus, by feeding and habituating the bird, they likely produced the bad behavior, ultimately leading to the animal’s death. 

I also find it fascinating that some people were so grief-stricken by the loss of this individual bird that they would hold a memorial service, as well as buy flowers and write notes to the deceased.  First of all, I sincerely doubt that “Freddy” would have appreciated the kind thoughts or flowers.  And since he could not read, the notes also seem a bit much.  Of course, we all know that the service was not so much for “Freddy” as it was for those humans he left behind. 

I don’t want to discount the bond that the people of Easton, MA  felt with “Freddy,” but as a conservationist, I have to wonder how we can redirect the tremendous energy and emotion focused on this individual animal toward the conservation of endangered species and their habitats?  I find it almost perverse that people are spending this much of their precious time and resources mourning one individual of a common species ( more than 3 million wild turkeys are estimated to roam the U.S.) when animals like black-footed ferrets, California condors, gopher tortoises, northern spotted owls, and many others are teetering on the brink of irreversible and final extinction.  Who will mourn them when they are gone?

Michael Hutchins Animal behavior, Human-wildlife conflict, Wildlife management, wildlife conservation

  1. Megan Moffett
    August 17th, 2009 at 17:36 | #1

    I will (mourn those who go extinct)! Perhaps some of Freddy’s mourners are mourning because they realize at some level that they share in the responsibility for Freddy’s death. Maybe as a memorial to Freddy they could make donations to help other wildlife in need “in Freddy’s name.” Just a thought.

  2. TurkeyEater
    August 18th, 2009 at 08:14 | #2

    I wonder how many of these folks will be eating a Turkey for dinner on Thanksgiving and Christmas this year.

  3. Pamela
    August 23rd, 2009 at 15:28 | #3

    Any time an animal has touched the heart of humans is worthy, no matter how “perverse” you judge it to be. You don’t know what will grow from that planted seed of compassion….more, certainly, than your snarky attitude that their emotion is invalid.

  4. Michael Hutchins
    August 24th, 2009 at 06:23 | #4

    Sorry, but I disagree. There are many examples of misplaced compassion going around. Please read my commentary about how some Europeans’ misplaced compassion for the introduced grey squirrel may very well lead to the irreversible extinction of the native red squirrel (Nutkin’s Last Stand). Emotions can be valid (i.e., real) and still be anti-conservation. What we need is reason and informed concern, not blind emotion.

  1. August 11th, 2009 at 13:46 | #1
  2. August 20th, 2009 at 06:55 | #2